Rohit Kumar Singh, PhD in Economics and PMP certified policy and trade professional, writes that tariff parity, rules of origin, and investment incentives under the India EU trade agreement could shift India away from cost based exports toward deeper value creation.
Tag: PLI scheme and export competitiveness India
-
Rohit Kumar Singh on How the India EU Free Trade Agreement Could Change the Nature of India’s Exports
India’s trade relationship with Europe has long been significant, but rarely transformative. Bilateral trade stood at about 136.5 billion dollars in 2024 25, with Indian exports accounting for 75.85 billion dollars. Yet scale alone has not delivered structural change. What India exports to Europe, and how those exports are positioned, has remained largely unchanged for years. This is why the India EU Free Trade Agreement deserves close attention. Not as a trigger for an immediate export surge, but as a framework that could alter the character of India’s export growth.
The textile sector illustrates this clearly. Indian apparel exports to the EU face tariffs ranging from 12 to 16 percent, while competitors such as Bangladesh and Vietnam benefit from preferential or zero duty access. Despite scale and experience, India struggles to expand its market share. In leather and footwear, India accounts for only about 3 percent of EU imports, a modest outcome for a country with a large manufacturing base.
Thin margins encourage conservative behaviour. Firms continue producing familiar, lower value products even if it traps them in commoditised segments. Duty free access creates room to move into higher quality categories such as technical textiles, man made fibre apparel, and sustainability linked fabrics that were previously difficult to justify.
Engineering goods and auto components may see the most consequential impact. India exports engineering goods worth about 16.6 billion dollars annually, while the EU import market exceeds 2 trillion dollars. Europe already absorbs a large share of India’s auto component exports, yet suppliers remain concentrated in relatively simple parts. Removing tariffs of up to 22 percent makes it economically sensible to move into higher value assemblies, electronics, and electric vehicle systems.
Cumulation provisions further strengthen the framework by allowing manufacturers to source inputs from partner countries while retaining preferential access, provided final processing occurs in India. This aligns with the reality of modern manufacturing, where supply chains are regional rather than purely national.
Employment outcomes follow structure. Textiles, leather, and food processing together employ over 80 million people. Restoring tariff parity helps protect these jobs while opening pathways to higher value activities. Small and medium enterprises, which account for nearly all manufacturing units, stand to benefit from deeper supply chain integration. Complementary initiatives such as the production linked incentive scheme strengthen this linkage between exports and domestic manufacturing.